National Site of Recognition for Thalidomide Survivors and their Families
Site
Theme: Genocide and/or Mass Crimes
Address
Wendouree Drive, Kings Park
Country
Australia
City
Canberra
Continent
Oceania
Theme: Genocide and/or Mass Crimes
Purpose of Memory
The National Thalidomide Survivors and Their Families Recognition Site acknowledges the thalidomide tragedy in Australia and serves as a lasting reminder of its consequences to all Australians. In particular, the Site honors the pain and suffering experienced by survivors, the memory of those who died prematurely, and the impact on their loved ones.
Public Access
Free
Location description
The site features a three-meter high glass brick structure with an undulating effect that symbolizes the widespread and lasting impact of thalidomide on the victims and their families and friends. The symbolic intent of the structure is that each brick represents the cell units of the human body. According to the authorities, the central empty space and the walkway formed there symbolize the emptiness in the lives of thalidomide victims. The walkway frames a view of Lake Burley Griffith intended to offer hope and a sense of wholeness. The bricks represent strength and endurance, while the glass functions as a symbol of the fragility of life and the importance of transparency and reflection. Engraved on many of the bricks are words chosen by thalidomide survivors, their family members, friends and caregivers to help convey the meaning and impact of the tragedy. These words reflect the strength and courage of the survivors, as well as the trauma and loss suffered: some of them are “Strength”, “Resilience” and “Determination”. The site’s lakeshore features a contemplative space set in a circular landscape setting. The surrounding concrete pavement, designed for this purpose, incorporates an engraved timeline highlighting key historical milestones related to the thalidomide tragedy in Australia. During the development of the project, the thalidomide community was consulted on the design and its key attributes.
The drug known as thalidomide was developed and manufactured by the German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal (now Grünenthal GmbH). The drug was initially marketed as a sleep-inducing agent, sedative and anti-nausea medicine for pregnant women, and was first marketed under the brand name Contergan in West Germany on 1 October 1957. Grünenthal immediately licensed thalidomide for sale worldwide. The first serious event associated with thalidomide use even preceded marketing, with the birth in West Germany of the first affected baby, the son of a Grünenthal employee, on 25 December 1956.
In April 1958, a licence was approved for the distribution of thalidomide throughout the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth of Nations, including Australia, by Distillers Company Biochemicals Limited (now Diageo) under the brand name Distaval. The sedative was promoted as a ‘miracle drug’ to treat a range of conditions, including headaches, insomnia and morning sickness in pregnant women. The advertisements highlighted the safety of the drug with phrases such as ‘non-toxic’ and ‘no known toxicity’. According to research by legal advocates for Australian thalidomide survivors, during 1958 alone, Grünenthal placed fifty advertisements for thalidomide in medical journals and sent more than 200,000 letters to doctors, as well as mailings to 50,000 doctors and pharmacists, making it the best-selling sleeping pill in its home country by the early 1960s. In 1959, Chemie Grünenthal dismissed a warning by Dr. Ralf Voss, a German neurologist from Düsseldorf, that ‘thalidomide damages the central nervous system’. During 1960, the company also received numerous reports about the toxic effect of thalidomide on the nervous system. However, company officials stepped up their campaign to maintain revenues: their brochures extolled the virtues of thalidomide and promoted its use among pregnant women: these promotional materials stated that it could be ‘safely administered to pregnant women and nursing mothers without any adverse effects to mother and child’ and that it was ‘extraordinarily safe’, ‘completely harmless to infants’ and ‘safe even during a long period of use’.
In June 1960, the sale of thalidomide began in Australia, although in the same year Dr Francis Kelsey, a reviewer for the US Food and Drug Administration, initiated an investigation into the paucity of supporting clinical evidence that ultimately blocked the distribution of thalidomide in that country (for her efforts to prevent the marketing of thalidomide and thus avert a major tragedy in the United States, Dr Kelsey received the 1962 President John F. Kennedy Distinguished Federal Civilian Service Award). In 1961, the German paediatrician Hans Rudolf Wiedemann drew attention to thirteen affected children who had been referred to him over a period of ten months. They had a number of associated malformations, including congenital heart disease, which led him to point to an epidemic. In the same year, German paediatrician Widukind Lenz and Australian obstetrician William McBride simultaneously but independently linked congenital malformations to thalidomide use. On 27 November, Chemie Grünenthal reluctantly withdrew thalidomide from the West German market. On 2 December, Distillers Company Biochemicals Ltd did the same for the British and Australian markets. On 16 December, a letter from Dr William McBride was published in The Lancet, publicly establishing for the first time a link between thalidomide and birth defects. McBride had notified the distributor in Australia of his findings in April, and the Crown Street Hospital for Women in Sydney in May.
Despite this background and the fact that the Australian Ministry of Health was informed of the dangers of thalidomide in late 1961, government agencies did not act immediately to destroy supplies or ban the use of the drug. According to the Australian Senate Community Affairs and References Committee’s March 2019 Final Report ‘When it became clear in November 1961 that thalidomide was linked to birth defects and Distillers withdrew the drug from sale, neither state governments nor the Australian government took prompt action to ban the importation of thalidomide or prohibit its sale. Unlike in other countries, no effort was made to recall and destroy the product found in doctors’ clinics or pharmacies’. The Australian government finally banned the sale of thalidomide on 9 August 1962.
Research into the consequences of thalidomide use by pregnant women has shown that these include birth defects such as ‘shortened or missing limbs, blindness, deafness or malformed internal organs’ for their children, according to the Australian Department of Health. The drug was never clinically tested on pregnant women before it was approved. Otto Ambros and Heinrich Mückter, employees of Chemie Grünenthal credited as inventors of thalidomide in 1953, were later shown to have been involved under the supervision of Joseph Mengele in experiments on female prisoners of war, administering a preparation of the same chemical formula as thalidomide at the Auschwitz extermination camp during 1944. Ambros had been Hitler’s adviser on chemical warfare. Convicted at Nuremberg in 1948 of mass murder and enslavement, he was sentenced to eight years in prison. Four years later he was released from prison to assist in Cold War research, which he did by working for J. Peter Grace, Dow Chemical and the US Army Chemical Corps. Ambros was a member of the board of directors and chairman of the Grünenthal advisory board at the time of the development of thalidomide. For his part, Mückter conducted chemical experiments on people in the Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration and extermination camps. Responsible for the deaths of hundreds of prisoners, after the war Mückter was finally offered the opportunity to continue his work at Chemie Grünenthal. As the company’s Chief Scientist and Head of Research, he was credited with the development of thalidomide and the responsibility for its marketing and promotion.
According to the Thalidomide Group of Australia, a civil society organization that brings together survivors and their families, “It is estimated that more than 10,000 children worldwide have been born with birth defects due to thalidomide use, with 40% of them dying within a year. Thalidomide survivors are still living with the consequences of the drug today”. The thalidomide crisis led to increased medical oversight worldwide, including the creation of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and made the drug one of the most important cases of the 20th century in terms of mobilizing health legislation by marking the starting point for the implementation of drug safety and pharmacovigilance concepts. It also triggered ethical debates about the behavior of the pharmaceutical industry and the living conditions and rights of people with drug-induced disabilities. The actions of civil society in Australia and in other countries worldwide with thalidomide victims among their citizens promoted social debate in several areas, such as conflicts of interest in healthcare and the practices of some companies related to research involving human beings as subjects of experimentation. In this way, they contributed to the emergence and consolidation of bioethics in the field of scientific research in general and medical research in particular.
During 1962, the same year the Australian government banned the sale of thalidomide-based medicines, a midwife named Rennie Simmons published an illustrated booklet in that country called ‘Warning to Women’ in response to the government’s inaction in notifying society of the dangers of the drug. Also in 1962, the first organised civil society efforts to seek recognition and redress began in other countries such as the United Kingdom, with the creation of the Thalidomide Society. By the second half of that decade, the Australian government made facilities available for the fitting of artificial limbs to children without upper or lower limbs, a tacit recognition of the far-reaching consequences of thalidomide treatments.
In 1968, the company Chemie Grünenthal was tried in Germany on charges of attempted bodily harm and manslaughter. Two years later, the German government prematurely terminated the proceedings against Grünenthal, declaring that the trial was ‘not in the public interest’. With the company that developed thalidomide being challenged in its home country, in 1971 the parents of a small group of thalidomide survivors sought compensation from Distillers Company Limited, the distributor licensed by Grünenthal to sell thalidomide in Australia. In 1974, Distillers settled and recognised 40 Australian and New Zealand survivors. This group became the first recognised collective of Australian thalidomide survivors.
In the 2000s, English thalidomide survivors contacted Diageo (the company that bought Distillers in 1997 and inherited their litigation) and secured another provision to help thalidomide survivors in the UK. In October 2008, the father of one of the recognised Australian thalidomide victims led an effort to obtain additional compensation from Diageo, which after arduous negotiations agreed in 2010 to provide ex-gratia payments to recognised thalidomide survivors for at least 18 years. During the same period, a group of uncompensated thalidomide survivors sought eligibility for the ex-gratia scheme. When Diageo refused to include them in the scheme, a class action was launched in Victoria. By the time the class action ended in February 2014, the class consisted of 107 members and Diageo had settled for about $89 million.
Partly thanks to these legal movements based on financial compensation for damages suffered, Australian thalidomide survivors consolidated their collective organisation through the Thalidomide Group Australia. This group initiated advocacy campaigns with legislators and Australian government representatives in 2014, which resulted in 2018 in the Australian Ministry of Health’s request for a Senate Inquiry into Support for Australian Thalidomide Survivors. The Australian Senate Community Affairs References Committee issued its final report in March 2019. It states that ‘The committee considers that Australian governments have a moral obligation to Australian thalidomide survivors. The committee notes that both the Australian and state governments failed to monitor the safety of the drug at a time when other governments around the world were doing so. Documents provided to the committee show that the Australian government was aware that more could be done to safeguard public health from dangerous medicines. The committee notes that the establishment of the Therapeutic Goods Administration was a direct consequence of the thalidomide catastrophe and takes note of evidence provided to the enquiry suggesting that such a body could and should have been established earlier’.
The report also incorporated requests from the Thalidomide Group Australia which, in addition to social and economic benefits, included for the first time a formal apology from the government and ‘a plaque of recognition to Australian thalidomide survivors and their parents, to be placed in a significant location’. In its final chapter, the Committee’s report issued 11 recommendations to the Australian government, the first of which was to ‘recommend that the Australian government apologise to thalidomide survivors and their families’. In October 2020 the government issued its response to the report’s recommendations, accepting the first of these. As a direct result of this process, the Australian Thalidomide Survivor Support Programme was established in 2021, which in addition to being the instrument for implementing health, social and economic benefits for victims -whether previously recognised or not- was responsible for the construction of the National Site of Recognition, inaugurated on 30 November 2023. A day earlier, Australia’s Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, issued the State’s official apology to all Australians affected by the thalidomide tragedy. The survivor community was involved in the design process and choice of key attributes throughout the development of the project.
Organization in Charge - Main Referent
Links of interest
National Site of Recognition for Thalidomide Survivors and their Families
Support for Australia's thalidomide survivors: final report
Thalidomide survivors to receive national apology for pharmaceutical 'disaster' - ABC News
After decades of pain, ‘thalidomiders’ welcome national apology but still mourn loved ones
Australia to apologise half a century after 'Thalidomide tragedy' | Reuters
Thalidomide – Detailed History and Timeline
”Warning to Women” por Rennie Simmons
The Thalidomide Memorial - A Timeline
A tragédia da talidomida: a luta pelos direitos das vítimas e por melhor regulação de medicamentos